“The justices on Friday night rejected the Texas case, which argued Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan officials altered their state election laws without approval from state legislatures.”

Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 | Constitution

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature [or as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court] thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress…

The U.S. Supreme Court since the 1960s have been more adept at finding language that clearly is not in the constitution than language that clearly is.

Take for example, the U.S. Supreme Court‘s decision handed down on June 13, 1966 Miranda v. Arizona which became law of the land by one vote, in a 5-4 ruling.

As a result before questioning someone in custody for the most heinous crime you can imagine (think little girl and things sane people don’t want to think about), the police are legally required to inform the “suspect”: Mr. Suspect, Hey you don’t have to talk to us if you don’t want. And if you do talk to us, we can use anything you say against you. If you like you can have an attorney before any questioning. Can’t afford one? Not to worry the taxpayers will pay for a liar to represent you.

Now Mr. Suspect would you like to talk to us?

And 18 months later even though the judge, the prosecutor and the public defender knows the dirt bag is as guilty as sin, if his taxpayer funded liar is successful in having the scumbag escape justice, while the victim’s family weeps and the police officer just shakes his head, the liar will be congratulated for his prowess and liaring skills in having the jury return a not guilty verdict.

There is absolutely no part of the Fifth, Sixth Amendment or any part of the U.S. Constitution you can read and legitimately argue for Miranda v. Arizona but it was passed by ONE vote. It was simply made out of whole cloth by justices who have no reverence for our constitution.

Trump says Supreme Court ‘let us down’ on election challenge

By Alex Swoyer and Dave Boyer – The Washington Times – Saturday, December 12, 2020

President Trump said early Saturday the Supreme Court let America down by not hearing an election challenge brought by Texas against four battleground states, and he vowed to “fight on.”

“The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!” the president tweeted hours after the high court announced it would not consider the case. “It is a legal disgrace, an embarrassment to the USA!!!”

The president criticized the justices for rejecting what he called a well-reasoned complaint, without weighing the legal arguments.


“So, you’re the President of the United States, and you just went through an election where you got more votes than any sitting President in history, by far – and purportedly lost,” the president tweeted. “You can’t get ‘standing’ before the Supreme Court, so you ‘intervene’ with wonderful states that, after careful study and consideration, think you got ‘screwed’, something which will hurt them also. Many others likewise join the suit but, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought. A Rigged Election, fight on!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s